From chymistry to chemistry
90 minTrace a gradual disciplinary reorganisation rather than a single moment of replacement.
Alchemy After Alchemy
Analyse how disciplines drew boundaries around alchemy and how later cultures repeatedly remade it.
Study requirement: complete Alchemy in Workshop and Court before this level opens. You may purchase it in advance or choose the complete pathway.
The syllabus.
Six 90-minute guided modules account for approximately nine hours. Source work, the field notebook capstone, revision and final assessment add approximately three hours.
Reconstruction and the material turn
90 minUse historically informed experiments to recover embodied knowledge and test interpretations.
The alchemist in art
90 minRead laboratory paintings as arguments about labour, folly, family and knowledge.
Global comparison without a false universal
90 minCompare traditions of transformation while preserving language, purpose and historical difference.
Occult revival and popular reinvention
90 minFollow alchemical symbols into esotericism, psychology, fiction and visual branding.
Curating the changing matter cabinet
90 minSynthesize objects, texts, experiments and contested claims into a transparent exhibition.
Timed project route
Three-hour capstone studio
Turn the six notebook checkpoints into a coherent advanced-level inquiry. The result should demonstrate how to design an independent inquiry, test rival explanations and communicate responsibly to a public audience, not merely repeat lesson summaries.
- 01Frame and plan20 min
Rewrite the capstone as one bounded research question. List the six notebook components you will reuse, identify the intended audience and state what the finished work will not claim.
- 02Audit the evidence40 min
Select at least four authoritative public resources and build a citation ledger. For every source, record the item or page, institution, date, access date, direct evidence, interpretive use and one limitation.
- 03Build the synthesis55 min
Draft the required exhibition, dossier, protocol, atlas or case study. Connect each claim to a source or notebook observation, preserve local terminology and keep observation separate from interpretation.
- 04Challenge the argument30 min
Write the strongest reasonable rival interpretation. Test it against the same evidence, retain one unresolved disagreement and revise any sentence that carries more certainty than its source.
- 05Edit and document25 min
Finish the 200-word evidence-limit statement, standardise citations, add useful headings and check that a reader can distinguish fact, historical claim, interpretation and reflection without assistance.
- 06Revise for assessment10 min
Review the six module explanations and your corrected knowledge checks. Note three reasoning rules you will apply in the final assessment and one area that requires another source check.
Completion checklist
- A bounded question and clearly identified audience
- Evidence from all six notebook checkpoints
- At least four complete public-source citations
- A rival interpretation and unresolved disagreement
- A 200-word evidence-limit statement
- A conclusion that respects this pathway boundary: successful operations such as distillation or alloying do not prove every alchemical theory, while failed transmutation does not erase practical knowledge
Research foundations.
Lessons are independently written and source-led. These starting collections support the pathway; individual modules explain interpretation limits.
Alchemists and Early Scientists
Books of Secrets: Writing and Reading Alchemy
The Whole of Nature and the Mirror of Art
One-off access
Alchemy After Alchemy
No subscription. Unlimited revision-led assessment retakes.